Contrast-induced encephalopathy mimicking subarachnoid hemorrhage in the intensive care unit
Article information
A 57-year-old woman underwent elective cerebral arteriography for evaluation of a known aneurysm located at the M1-M2 bifurcation of the right middle cerebral artery. During the procedure, the patient developed acute speech disturbance and right-sided weakness, without associated headaches, nausea, or vomiting. On neurological examination, the patient was lethargic and mildly confused, with Broca’s aphasia, leftward gaze deviation, and right hemiparesis. A non-contrast head computed tomography performed immediately after symptom onset revealed spontaneous hyperdensity within the subarachnoid space of the left hemisphere, consistent with subarachnoid hemorrhage (Fig. 1). The patient was promptly started on intravenous hydration and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for close neurological monitoring. Several hours after admission, a single generalized seizure occurred, effectively managed with intravenous phenytoin; no maintenance anticonvulsive therapy was required. Infectious and metabolic evaluations were unremarkable. The patient remained under intensive supportive care and made a full neurological recovery within 48 hours. This case highlights the importance of recognizing contrast-induced encephalopathy as a stroke mimic [1], particularly in ICU settings, to avoid misdiagnosis and guide appropriate management [1-3].
(A) Initial non-contrast cranial computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrating asymmetric cortical spontaneous hyperdensity within the subarachnoid space of the left hemisphere, predominantly affecting the left parietal and occipital lobes. White arrow indicates the contrast distributed in the subarachnoid space. No associated mass effect or midline shift is observed. (B) Follow-up CT scan obtained 48 hours later reveals complete resolution of these findings. In conjunction with the clinical context, these imaging features support the diagnosis of contrast-induced-encephalopathy.
Notes
Ethics statement
The study was exempted from institutional review board (IRB) review. According to our local IRB rules, case reports do not need to be approved if informed consent from the patient was obtained. Informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: MESFB. Methodology: MESFB. Formal analysis: JBCA. Data curation: MESFB, CECH. Visualization: GPMAS. Project administration: LSM. Writing - original draft: GPMAS, CECH. Writing - review & editing: JBCA.
